![]() That event did happen, and while it wasn't the catalyst of Wallace's vendetta against the English, it was the straw that broke the back. Wallace's wife Murron MacClannough ( Catherine McCormack) is publicly executed in the film. Women do not fare much better in the film. There's no evidence that Edward II even was gay, nor is there any record that 1st Earl of Cornwall Piers Gaveston (named 'Phillip' in the film, played by Stephen Billington), who in the film as Edward's male lover, was pushed out a window to his death by King Edward I ( Patrick McGoohan), although he was sent into exile by the monarch. Edward II is portrayed not only as homosexual but also as weak, impotent, and effeminate. The harshest stereotype, however, is given to Edward II ( Peter Hanly). While the Scottish are made out as manly men, the English are portrayed as much weaker and more feminine overall. The kilts and belted plaid in the film weren't worn by the Scots until the late-16th century, problematic for a film set in the 13th century (for that matter, English soldiers wouldn't have had matching royal uniforms). In actuality, Wallace was born in the Southwest of Scotland, the son of a minor nobleman. A young Wallace and his family, in the film, are poor farmers living in a Highland glen. If that were indeed true, then Braveheart has arguably the most realistic portrayal of Scots on film. Handsomely mounted, 'Braveheart' is positively one of the most memorable films of 1990s.When one pictures a Scot, the image typically depicted is one of a working-class, kilt-wearing ruffian playing bagpipes. 'Braveheart' is one of those few films that is so ambitious and sets it's bar so high, and delivered. It tastes like it's storyline is being shifted away from the right track. ![]() I would be reluctant to mention specifically on which part of the plot is flawed, but they are simply too abrupt, unbelievable and most importantly, overly dramatic. Absolutely, these mentioned praises would be missing without Mel Gibson's precious direction.Ī major let-down would be the inconsistency which lies in the contents of the story. Unlike some modern war films, fighting scenes are so believable and engaging, and yes, realism is there. Battle sequences are so well executed, and one fact that I massively admire about this film is that there is no CGI involved. Hands down, the movie is being effectively photographed. Shots are so subtle and are near perfection. He might be labelled as coward or a hypocrite, but assuredly, this "Longshanks" character is a pretty good villain. Surely, what excites me was his approach for the character a cool, quiet, and methodically behaved, and at the same time, a cold and violent human being. He played the main villain of the story named King Edward "Longshanks". Patrick McGoohan's work for this film did hold my attention. Also, I honestly believe that if this charming music is absent, the picture would not be so memorable.Īcting performances are good, but not outstanding. I am going to put aside any sense of familiarity here, but whenever the music is being played, my love for this film grows. I have to admit that I am slightly puzzled with it at times it feels like a genuine Scottish music, but also at the same time it feels like a plain modern music, but either way it is beautiful. In my personal opinion, the most memorable element of 'Braveheart' is it's music, which was being composed by the talented James Horner. The film grabbed five academy awards including best picture. An undeniably immense picture, it is one of few epics that could possibly move millions. 'Braveheart' managed to sweep through with romance, drama and war. It's music sips through my ear, enters me, moved me, and almost tear me up. I could still remember on how reposeful I am while watching this movie.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |